Void Linux Switching Back to OpenSSL

23.02.2021

Switching back to OpenSSL

The Void Linux team is switching back to OpenSSL on March 5th, 2021 (2021-03-05).

For most users, there should be no noticeable change. If you have any packages installed that are no longer provided by Void, or your system has explicit dependencies on LibreSSL, you will of course need to take action to ensure your system continues to function after the switch.

If you experience any issues, feel free to reach out to us! You can open an issue on GitHub or ping us in the #voidlinux channel on https://freenode.net.

---

A discussion about switching to OpenSSL began in a Request For Comments (RFC) posted on April 12th, 2020, at void-linux/void-packages#20935. Since then, a majority of Void maintainers have expressed support for the move. The main reasons for the switch are as listed in the RFC:

• Because most software targets OpenSSL, Void will no longer have to maintain (in some cases, very complex) patches to support LibreSSL. The complexity of the OpenSSL API makes such patching burdensome and risky, with mistakes potentially causing runtime errors or security issues - we have avoided those, as far as we know, but this has required a lot of effort.
• Extensive support for platform specific optimizations outside of x86.
• Access to new standards and algorithms earlier, such as full TLS 1.3 support.

As a result of the above, the switch to OpenSSL is expected to lessen the time and effort spent on packages that require an OpenSSL-like library. This is especially notable because most other distributions which used LibreSSL have dropped it, so there aren’t as many people amongst whom to distribute the effort.

• Alpine, which switched to LibreSSL temporarily, switched back to OpenSSL in January 2019, with the 3.9.0 release.
• More recently, Gentoo, which used to offer LibreSSL as an option, has discontinued that support as well.

For further context, LWN covered the subject of LibreSSL on Linux at the beginning of this year. The article also covers the attention and improvements that the OpenSSL project has received post-Heartbleed, which was one of the main reasons for Void’s initial switch to LibreSSL.

For an example of extra work caused by packages that expect OpenSSL, Void’s version of Qt5 is heavily patched in order to properly support LibreSSL. Furthermore, the just released Qt6 would also need significant effort to be patched and maintained to use LibreSSL, without the possibility of such effort being upstreamed.

At the same time, other software can have limited functionality or hit edge cases when using LibreSSL, due to not being thoroughly tested with it. One example is Python, which is limited in the ciphers available to running programs, since it depends on what the SSL library provides - they are even considering dropping any support for LibreSSL in the future. Another example is OpenVPN, which we have received bug reports for connection issues with LibreSSL (void-linux/void-packages#23413). This required us to switch the package to use Mbed TLS by default, resulting in some limitations to the resulting package. With the switch to OpenSSL, the OpenVPN package will now be provided in the most widely deployed and tested configuration, so similar compatibility hiccups are unlikely to reappear.

Unfortunately, this move has required us to drop some packages that rely on the OpenSSL 1.0.1 API; while LibreSSL maintains compatibility with this legacy API, modern OpenSSL has abandoned it.

One great feature of LibreSSL not offered by OpenSSL is the libtls library, which aims to be a hard to misuse interface for communicating over the web safely, with sane defaults and hard to misuse. Some of the packages we ship depend on it, so work has been done to package a standalone version of it in void-linux/void-packages#28732.

The Void Linux team is grateful for the work of the OpenBSD community on libressl-portable, we have greatly benefited from their work. Void continues to package other excellent OpenBSD software, including OpenSSH and signify, which is our tool of choice for signing live images.

In conclusion, we expect our switch to OpenSSL to ease maintenance overhead, provide the same reliable experience to users, and improve functionality in select packages. Look forward to the update landing some time after March 5th!

from Hacker News https://ift.tt/3aXNJb9