The Reemergent 1977 H1N1 Strain and the Gain-of-Function Debate (2015)

APPENDIX

Figure 2 bibliography

1. World Health Organization. 1978. Influenza. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 53:21–24.

2. Shortridge K, Webster RG, Kam SL, Gardner JM. 1979. Reappearance of H1N1 influenza virus in man: evidence for the persistence of the virus in domestic chickens. Bull World Health Organ 57:475–477.

3. Scholtissek C, von Hoyningen V, Rott R.

1978. Genetic relatedness between the new 1977 epidemic strains (H1N1) of influenza and human influenza strains isolated between 1947 and 1957 (H1N1). Virology

89:

613–617. doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6822(78)90203-9

.

4. Kendal AP, Noble GR, Skehel JJ, Dowdle WR.

1978. Antigenic similarity of influenza A(H1N1) viruses from epidemics in 1977–1978 to “Scandinavian” strains isolated in epidemics of 1950–1951. Virology

89:

632–636. doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0042-6822(78)90207-6

.

5. Kung HC, Jen KF, Yuan WC, Tien SF, Chu CM. 1978. Influenza in China in 1977: recurrence of influenzavirus A subtype H1N1. Bull World Health 53:913–918.

6. Young JF, Palese P.

1979. Evolution of human influenza A viruses in nature: recombination contributes to genetic variation of H1N1 strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

76:

6547–6551. doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.12.6547

.

9. Shilov AA, Kozlov IV, Kurmanova AG, Gorbulev VG, Selivanov IM. 1981. Analysis of structural divergence of H1N1 serotype influenza virus individual genes. Mol Biol 15:1371–1384. (In Russian.)

11. Laver WG, Webster RG, Chu CM.

1984. From the National Institutes of Health. Summary of a meeting on the origin of pandemic influenza viruses. J Infect Dis

149:

108–115. doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/149.1.108

.

12. Litwin SD. 1989. Human immunogenetics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

13. Gill PW, Murphy AM, Cunningham AL. 1991. Influenza A(H1N1): a widening spectrum? Med J Aust 155:362–367.

14. Webster RG, Bean WJ, Gorman OT, Chambers TM, Kawaoka Y. 1992. Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiol Rev 56:152–179.

15 .Alexander DJ, Brown IH. 2000. Recent zoonoses caused by influenza A viruses. Rev Sci Tech 19:197–225.

16. Knobler S, Lederberg J, Pray LA. 2002. Considerations for viral disease eradication: lessons learned and future strategies: workshop summary. Institute of Medicine Forum on Emerging Infections. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

19. Zhang G, Shoham D, Gilichinsky D, Davydov S, Castello JD, Rogers SO.

2006. Evidence of influenza A virus RNA in Siberian lake ice. J Virol

80:

12229–12235. doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00986-06

.

22. Krasnitz M, Levine AJ, Rabadan R.

2008. Anomalies in the Influenza Virus Genome Database: new biology or laboratory errors? J Virol

82:

8947–8950. doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00101-08

.

23. Taubenberger JK, Morens DM. 2009. Pandemic influenzaùincluding a risk assessment of H5N1. Rev Sci Tech 28:187–202.

24. Brown D. 17 May 2009. Scientists consider age of swine flu victims evidence of pandemic potential. Washington Post, Washington, DC.

26. Sellwood C.

2009. Brief history and epidemiological features of pandemic influenza, p 41u56.

In

Introduction to pandemic influenza. CAB International, Wallingford, England. doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781845936259.0041

.

31. Budowle B, Schutzer SE, Breeze RG, Keim PS, Morse SA. 2010. Microbial forensics. Academic Press, New York, NY.

32. Wertheim JO.

2010. The re-emergence of H1N1 influenza virus in 1977: a cautionary tale for estimating divergence times using biologically unrealistic sampling dates. Plos One

5:

e11184. doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011184

.

33. Huang SS, Lin Z, Banner D, León AJ, Paquette SG, Rubin B, Rubino S, Guan Y, Kelvin DJ, Kelvin AA.

2013. Immunity toward H1N1 influenza hemagglutinin of historical and contemporary strains suggests protection and vaccine failure. Sci Rep

3:

1698. doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep01698

.

35. Wain-Hobson S, Weiss RA, Hale P, Gatel JM, Hanekom W, Le Gall S, et al.

18 December 2013. Response to letter by the European Society for Virology on “gain-of-function” influenza research and proposal to organize a scientific briefing for the European Commission and conduct a comprehensive risk-benefit assessment.

http://news.sciencemag.org/sites/default/files/media/Letter%20to%20Barroso_0.pdf

.

40. Casadevall A, Howard D, Imperiale MJ.

2014. The apocalypse as a rhetorical device in the influenza virus gain-of-function debate. mBio

5

(5):e02062–14. doi:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02062-14

.

from Hacker News https://ift.tt/34Ooggi