Emoji under the hood
For the past few weeks, I’ve been implementing emoji support for Skija. I thought it might be fun sharing a few nitty-gritty details of how this “biggest innovation in human communication since the invention of the letter ๐ ฐ️” works under the hood.
Warning: some emoji might not display as expected on your device. In that case, use this text version: ¯\_(ใ)_/¯
Intro to Unicode
As you might know, all text inside computers is encoded with numbers. One letter—one number. The most popular encoding we use is called Unicode, with the two most popular variations called UTF-8 and UTF-16.
Unicode allocates 2²¹ (~2 mil) characters called codepoints. Sorry, programmers, but it’s not a multiply of 8 ๐คท. Out of those 2 million, actually defined are ~150k characters.
150k defined characters cover all the scripts used on ๐, many dead languages, a lot of weird stuff like ๐ฃ๐ฒ๐ซ๐ซ๐ถ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ฃ๐ค, sษนวสสวl uสop-วpแดsdn, GHz as one glyph: ㎓, “rightwards two-headed arrow with tail with double vertical stroke”: ⤘, seven-eyed monster: ๊ฎ, and a duck:
As a side note, definitely check out the Egyptian Hieroglyphs block (U+13000–U+1342F). They have some really weird stuff.
Basic emoji
So, emoji. At their simplest, they are just that: another symbol in a Unicode table. Most of them are grouped in U+1F300–1F6FF and U+1F900–1FAFF.
That’s why emoji behave like any other letter: they can be typed in a text field, copied, pasted, rendered in a plain text document, embedded in a tweet, etc. When you type “A”, the computer sees U+0041. When you type “๐ต”, the computer sees U+1F335. Not much difference.
Emoji fonts
Why are emoji rendered as images then? Well, bitmap fonts. Apparently, you can create a font that has pngs for glyphs instead of boring black-and-white vector shapes.
Every OS comes with a single pre-installed font for emoji. On macOS/iOS, that’s Apple Color Emoji. Windows has Segoe UI Emoji, Android has Noto Color Emoji.
As far as I can tell, Apple is a bitmap font with 160×160 raster glyphs, Noto uses 128×128 bitmaps, and Segoe is a vector color font ๐.
That’s why emoji look different on different devices—just like fonts look different! On top of that, many apps bundle their own emoji fonts, too: WhatsApp, Twitter, Facebook.
Font fallbacks
Now about the rendering. You don’t write your text in Apple Color Emoji or Segoe UI Emoji fonts (unless you are really young and pure at heart ❤️). So how can a text set in e.g. Helvetica include emoji?
Well, with the same machinery that makes Cyrillic text look ugly in Clubhouse or on Medium: font fallbacks.
When you type, say, U+1F419, it is first looked up in your current font. Let’s say it’s San Francisco. San Francisco doesn’t have a glyph for U+1F419, so OS starts to look for any other installed font that might have it.
U+1F419 can only be found in Apple Color Emoji, thus OS uses it to render U+1F419 (rest of the text stays in your current font). In the end, you see ๐. That’s why, no matter which font you use, Emoji always look the same:
Variation selector-16
Not all Emoji started their life straight in Emoji code block. In fact, pictograms existed in fonts and Unicode at least since 1993. Look in Miscellaneous Symbols U+2600-26FF and Dingbats U+2700-27FF:
These glyphs are as normal as any other letters we use: they are single-codepoint, black-and-white, and many fonts have them included. For example, here are all the differnt fonts on my machine that have their own version of ✂︎ (U+2702 BLACK SCISSORS):
Guess what? When Apple Color Emoji was created, it had its own version of the same U+2702 codepoint that looked like this:
Now for the tricky part. How does OS knows when to render ✂︎ and when ✂️, if both of them have the same codepoint and not only Apple Color Emoji has it, but also many other higher-priority traditional fonts?
Meet U+FE0F, also known as VARIATION SELECTOR-16. It’s a hint to the text renderer to switch to an emoji font.
U+2702 — ✂︎ U+2702 U+FE0F — ✂️ U+2697 – ⚗︎ U+2697 U+FE0F – ⚗️ U+26A0 – ⚛︎ U+26A0 U+FE0F – ⚛️ U+2618 – ☘︎ U+2618 U+FE0F – ☘️
Simple, elegant, and no need to allocate new codepoints while the old ones are already there. After all, things like ☠︎ and ☠️ have the same meaning, only the presentation is different.
Grapheme clusters
Here we encounter another problem — our emoji are now not a single codepoint, but two. This means we need a way to define character boundaries.
Meet Grapheme Clusters. Grapheme cluster is a sequence of codepoints that is considered a single human-perceived glyph.
Grapheme Clusters were not invented just for emoji, they apply to normal alphabets too. “Ü” is a single grapheme cluster, even though it’s composed of two codepoints: U+0055 UPPER-CASE U followed by U+0308 COMBINING DIAERESIS.
Grapheme clusters create many complications for programmers. You can’t just do substring(0, 10)
to take the first 10 characters—you might split an emoji in half (or an acute, so don’t do it anyway)!
Reversing a string is tricky, too—while U+263A U+FE0F makes sense, U+FE0F U+263A does not.
Finally, you can’t just call .length
on a string. Well, you can, but the result will surprise you. If you a developer, try this "๐คฆ๐ผ♂️".length
in your browser’s console.
A tip for programmers: if you are working with text, get a library that is grapheme clusters-aware. For C, C++m and JVM that would be ICU, Swift does the right thing out-of-the-box, for others, see for yourself.
Grapheme clusters awareness month, anyone? Graphemes don’t want to be split! Oh, who am I kidding? for (int i = 0; i < str.length; ++i) str[i]
go brrr!
Oh, by the way, did I mentioned that this: ลฒ̷̡̡̨̫͍̟̯̣͎͓̘̱̖̱̣͈͍̫͖̮̫̹̟̣͉̦̬̬͈͈͔͙͕̩̬̐̏̌̉́̾͑̒͌͊͗́̾̈̈́̆̅̉͌̋̇͆̚̚̚͠ͅ is a single grapheme cluster, too? Its length is 65, and it shouldn’t ever be split in half. Sleep tight ๐ :)
Skin tone modifier
Most human Emoji depict an abstract yellow person. When skin tone was added in 2015, instead of adding a new codepoint for each emoji and skin tone combination, only five new codepoints were added: ๐ป๐ผ๐ฝ๐พ๐ฟ U+1F3FB..U+1F3FF.
These are not supposed to be used on their own but to be appended to the existing emoji. Together they form a ligature: ๐ (U+1F44B WAVING HAND SIGN) directly followed by ๐ฝ (U+1F3FD MEDIUM SKIN TONE MODIFIER) becomes ๐๐ฝ.
๐๐ฝ does not have its own codepoint (it’s a sequence of two: U+1F44B U+1F3FD), but it has its own unique look. With just five modifiers, ~280 human emojis got turned into 1680 variations. Here’re some dancers:
๐บ๐บ๐ป๐บ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐บ๐พ๐บ๐ฟ
Zero-width Joiner
Let’s say your friend just sent you a picture of an apple she is growing in her garden. You need to reply—how? You might send a ๐ฉ WOMAN EMOJI (U+1F469), followed by a ๐พ SHEAF OF RICE (U+1F33E). If you put the two together: ๐ฉ๐พ, nothing happens. It’s just two separate emoji.
But! If you add U+200D in between, magic happens: they turn into the one ๐ฉ๐พ woman farmer.
U+200D is called ZERO-WIDTH JOINER, or ZWJ for short. It works similarly to what we saw with skin tone, but this time you can join two self-sufficient emoji into one. Not all combinations work, but many do, sometimes in surprising ways!
Some examples:
๐ฉ + ✈️ → ๐ฉ✈️ ๐จ + ๐ป → ๐จ๐ป ๐ฐ + ♂️ → ๐ฐ♂️ ๐ป + ❄️ → ๐ป❄️ ๐ด + ☠️ → ๐ด☠️ ๐ณ️ + ๐ → ๐ณ️๐
One weird inconsistency I’ve noticed is that hair color is done via ZWJ, while skin tone is just modifier emoji with no joiner. Why? Seriously, I am asking you: why? I have no clue.
๐จ + ๐ฟ U+1F3FF → ๐จ๐ฟ ๐จ + ZWJ + ๐ฆฐ → ๐จ๐ฆฐ
Unfortunately, some emoji are NOT implemented as combinations with ZWJ. I consider those missing opportunities:
๐จ + ๐ฆท ≠ ๐ง ๐จ + ๐ ≠ ๐ง ๐ฉ + ๐ ≠ ๐ต️♀️ ๐ + ๐ ≠ ๐ ๐ + ๐ ≠ ๐ ๐ + ๐ง ≠ ☔️ ๐ด + ๐ ≠ ๐ฆ ๐ + ๐ ≠ ๐ฃ ๐ + ๐ฆ ≠ ๐ ๐ฆต + ๐ฆต + ๐ช + ๐ช + ๐ + ๐ + ๐ + ๐ + ๐ + ๐ง ≠ ๐ง
How do you type ZWJ? You don’t. But you can copy it from here: “”. Note: this is a special character, so expect it to behave weird. It’s invisible, too. But it’s there.
Another big area where ZWJ shines is families and relationships configuration. A short story to illustrate:
๐จ๐ป + ๐ค + ๐จ๐ผ → ๐จ๐ป๐ค๐จ๐ผ ๐จ + ❤️ + ๐จ → ๐จ❤️๐จ ๐จ + ❤️ + ๐ + ๐จ → ๐จ❤️๐๐จ ๐จ + ๐จ + ๐ง → ๐จ๐จ๐ง ๐จ + ๐จ + ๐ง + ๐ง → ๐จ๐จ๐ง๐ง
Flags
Country flags are part of the Unicode standard, but for some reason are not implemented on Windows. If you are reading this in a browser from Windows—I am sorry!
Flags don’t have dedicated codepoints. Instead, they are two-letter ligatures.
๐บ + ๐ณ = ๐บ๐ณ ๐ท + ๐บ = ๐ท๐บ ๐ฎ + ๐ธ = ๐ฎ๐ธ ๐ฟ + ๐ฆ = ๐ฟ๐ฆ ๐ฏ + ๐ต = ๐ฏ๐ต
They don’t use real letters, though. Instead, the “regional indicator symbol letter” alphabet is used (U+1F1E6..1F1FF). These letters are not used for anything but composing flags.
What happens if you put together two random letters? Not much: ๐ฝ๐พ (except that text editing starts to behave strange).
If you want to experiment, feel free to copy and combine from this alphabet: ๐ฆ ๐ง ๐จ ๐ฉ ๐ช ๐ซ ๐ฌ ๐ญ ๐ฎ ๐ฏ ๐ฐ ๐ฑ ๐ฒ ๐ณ ๐ด ๐ต ๐ถ ๐ท ๐ธ ๐น ๐บ ๐ป ๐ผ ๐ฝ ๐พ ๐ฟ. There are 258 valid two-letter combinations. Can you find them all?
A funny side-effect of being two-letter ligature: ''.join(reversed('๐บ๐ฆ')) => '๐ฆ๐บ'
Tag Sequences
Two-letter ligatures are cool, but don’t you want to be cooler? How about 32-letter ligatures? Meet tag sequences.
Tag sequence is a sequence of normal emoji, followed by another flavor of Latin letters (U+E0020..E007E), terminated with U+E007F CANCEL TAG.
Currently they are used for these three flags only: England, Scotland and Wales:
๐ด + gbeng + E007F = ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ
๐ด + gbsct + E007F = ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ
๐ด + gbwls + E007F = ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ท๓ ฌ๓ ณ๓ ฟ
Keycaps
Not super-exciting, but needed for completeness: keycap sequences use yet another convention.
It goes like this: take a digit, * or #, turn it into emoji with U+FE0F, wrap into a square with U+20E3 COMBINING ENCLOSING KEYCAP:
* + FE0F + 20E3 = *️⃣
In total there are only twelve of them:
#️⃣ *️⃣ 0️⃣ 1️⃣ 2️⃣ 3️⃣ 4️⃣ 5️⃣ 6️⃣ 7️⃣ 8️⃣ 9️⃣
Unicode updates
Unicode is updated every year, and emoji are a major part of each release. E.g. in Unicode 13 (March 2020), 55 new Emoji were added.
At the moment of writing neither the latest macOS (11.2.3) nor iOS (14.4.1) support emoji from Unicode 13 like
๐ฎ๐จ, ❤️๐ฅ, ๐ง♀ or ๐จ๐ป❤️๐๐จ๐ผ
For future generations, this is what I see in March 2021:
But, thanks to the magic of ZWJ, I can still figure out what’s going on, just not in the most optimal way.
Conclusion
To sum up, these are seven ways emoji can be encoded:
- A single codepoint
๐ง U+1F9DB
- Single codepoint + variation selector-16
☹︎ U+2639 + U+FE0F = ☹️
- Skin tone modifier
๐คต U+1F935 + U+1F3FD = ๐คต๐ฝ
- Zero-width joiner sequence
๐จ + ZWJ + ๐ญ = ๐จ๐ญ
- Flags
๐ฆ + ๐ฑ = ๐ฆ๐ฑ
- Tag sequences
๐ด + gbsct + U+E007F = ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ณ๓ ฃ๓ ด๓ ฟ
- Keycap sequences
* + U+FE0F + U+20E3 = *️⃣
Techniques from 1-4 can be combined to construct a pretty complex message:
U+1F6B5 ๐ต Person Mountain Biking + U+1F3FB Light Skin Tone + U+200D ZWJ + U+2640 ♀️Female Sign + U+FE0F Variation selector-16 = ๐ต๐ป♀️ Woman Mountain Biking: Light Skin Tone
If you are a programmer, remember to always use the ICU library to:
- extract a substring,
- measure string length,
- reverse a string.
The keyword to google is “Grapheme Cluster”. It applies to emoji, to diacritics in Western languages, to Indic and Korean scripts, so please be aware.
That’s all I have. I hope the deeper understanding of how emoji work under the hood will help you in your work… Nah, just kidding. Hope you enjoyed it, though ✌️
Hi!
I’m Nikita. Here I write about programming and UI design Subscribe
I also create open-source stuff: Fira Code, AnyBar, DataScript and Rum. If you like what I do and want to get early access to my articles (along with other benefits), you should support me on Patreon.
from Hacker News https://ift.tt/2QrGAba
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.