Monday, May 30, 2016

Bugtraq: [SECURITY] [DSA 3588-1] symfony security update

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA256

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

-

Debian Security Advisory DSA-3588-1 security (at) debian (dot) org [email concealed]

http://ift.tt/1kZ5swi Luciano Bello

May 29, 2016 http://ift.tt/1S3Txy1

- ------------------------------------------------------------------------

-

Package : symfony

CVE ID : CVE-2016-1902 CVE-2016-4423

Two vulnerabilities were discovered in Symfony, a PHP framework.

CVE-2016-1902

Lander Brandt discovered that the class SecureRandom might generate

weak random numbers for cryptographic use under certain settings. If

the functions random_bytes() or openssl_random_pseudo_bytes() are not

available, the output of SecureRandom should not be consider secure.

CVE-2016-4423

Marek Alaksa from Citadelo discovered that it is possible to fill up

the session storage space by submitting inexistent large usernames.

For the stable distribution (jessie), these problems have been fixed in

version 2.3.21+dfsg-4+deb8u3.

For the testing distribution (stretch), these problems have been fixed

in version 2.8.6+dfsg-1.

For the unstable distribution (sid), these problems have been fixed in

version 2.8.6+dfsg-1.

We recommend that you upgrade your symfony packages.

Further information about Debian Security Advisories, how to apply

these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be

found at: http://ift.tt/1kZ5swi

Mailing list: debian-security-announce (at) lists.debian (dot) org [email concealed]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Version: GnuPG v1

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXSyojAAoJEG7C3vaP/jd0fkgP/Rg3MGnU+HOjA3yyqMpG44ui

pdYS9uxQHpfqrABEu4BxOOBikJmJOFTVbX6LgKRv7RD8ko0GocEfFVdVyIBg4q37

ym1Kue3pLUYG+ZSDZY3AFTDqOPHdEd1VV0g+NSHOfwQUxB5rZcWbknL1JGiyuZBt

vZ6S6t11zEUppBrjlVqFoLZyqaO/6gbOSEl3IYoBJ8nGvpsEb54Hr1xnA0V61BmO

LSsnXumvkljlWxfLmdbv6eFZZPeqcTUSTrhSY8HSG4fk1hZYmD5zCcmj9HwFwpDV

Ix8qIr2dYqDeP1kXt5vgaJnQnYDcFZswz97vgdc+u+JfpwZzzg5YNLzXtyWMLueb

AoTpYkKqyMKt9OYR2LMrR6MApd53SlUMssb6TGBUvrs75fkkInDnn98x7HMOBANf

eCZjsaR42tm0H2ydi1mEI3kC2OswLXoVakAw//jYlRoznocQ2J11SvDWZ3ZIVN9N

V2AhyotQSD67BYiEkt1n1uln3zoHLxf8rMXRKO1A0CT0TQujyvwucXQ9YrMjcvN9

TbjocikONjdvjrCGD7N5jYh6VFFjyLNgj+erXroGGnFWLq38Ao2+R+7ogMIUl4gX

20ygoVwNeo2Bb+vmUiPOGTmh53GpbuTxMQArpT7/647gwZJhb2CtkzMnDxMBoU2x

E4S/jTK1mnD7vScdwaNs

=gJF9

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ reply ]


from SecurityFocus Vulnerabilities http://ift.tt/24gfhei

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.